Sometimes, a single lens can not express your vision for a landscape scene. As my eyes see this scene, all looks amazing. When I make a capture with a wide angle lens, I get the image but what my eye sees as wonderful the camera renders less impressive. Here’s a way to reflect what the eye sees.
Initial image
First look at the scene, the red rock formations in the background look amazing. But, when I use a wide angle view to capture the entire scene, they are rendered very small. Remember, our eyes can focus in to see things different than a lens, especially with a wide angle lens. I was happy with the foreground. I decided to push the perspective with a second capture.
Second capture
Zooming the lens in allowed me to size the red rock formation in the background to a larger size. The secret here is to create a new image of the “proper” size to blend with the wide angle lens. Please note that I am creating art that matches my vision. I am not documenting the scene. That has an entirely different set of rules which to follow.
Blend
Using Photoshop, I processed both images under the same settings so they would “live” together as fas as color and tone. Both images were opened in Photoshop as layers. The background magnified image is masked into the wide angle shot. Both together better show how my eye saw the scene. Learning how your camera sees verses how your eye sees is an important part of image making. Hence this technique, forced perspective.
Share your thoughts in the comments. Cheers!
Yours in Creative Photography,
Bob















I will admit that this process happens more than it should. The most common occurrence I am aware of is an image of the Seattle skyline taken from Queen Ann Hill with Mt Rainier in the background. Using a wide angle lens to capture the city ends up making Mt. Rainier more diminutive in the eyes of the amateur taking the picture. Their solution is to making the mountain appear like it was in Renton. As a photographer for 30 plus years I can truthfully say that I have virtually never felt the need to enhance an object like this.… Read more »
Thanks for your thoughts Earl! All appreciated. Yours in Creative Photography, Bob
Bob:
Thank you for drawing attention to the discrepancy between what the camera reveals and our eye/mind. I have seen this frequently and did not know what to do. It frequently leaves the photographer with disappointment. I very much liked your approach. Being more an amateur than a pro with photoshop, is it possible to share in more detail the editing you did? I saw the layers images that you posted but was hoping for more detail if possible. Thank you.
HI Jeff, You are welcome. The secret is to work with layers and masks. Take the second image and place it above the base image. Add a mask. Know that white reveals what is on that layer, and black conceals what is on the layer. Use a brush to make those selections. The power of Photoshop is layers and masks so any lessons you find on that subject will be of help to you. Yours in Creative Photography, Bob
Thanks for the insight Bob, this is a great idea. As perhaps the previous commenter overlooked, you’re a lens-based *artist*, and I love how this artistic technique brings back the majesty of the scene that so often a wide angle lens hides. Thank you!
Thanks for the kind words Jim! It’s just a different possible way of seeing through the camera… Yours in Creative Photography, Bob
Very impressive!
Thanks Norma! Yours in Creative Photography, Bob