I just finished watching a , where they discuss critiquing the work of amateur photographers and how it is easy to be led astray. I’m sure we’ve all seen awful photos posted online and wondered what the photographer was thinking when they decided to share it. Sure, we all have to start somewhere, but no one is telling these people the truth! They have all been led to believe that their photographs are gorgeous, when in fact they have much to be desired.
This got me thinking. When I started photography, my only “critique” was through the inspectors at iStock. I would upload a photograph to my portfolio, and it was reviewed for technical and artistic merit before it could be available to be licensed. Social media sharing was also still in its infancy, and so I didn’t have hoards of people telling me only good things about my photographs. I grew on my own, and rarely had the chance to be critiqued.
Then, at my first Photoshop World in 2008, I finally had the opportunity to be critiqued in the “Portfolio Review” booth on the expo floor. The photographer looked at my portfolio, and had nothing bad to say. All of my photos, according to them, were great! I knew I wasn’t awful, but I was hoping to hear something that was wrong, something I could have done better. I guess it’s possible that my photos were, in fact, really good, but I was disappointed. I personally believe that nearly any photograph can be improved upon.
With any form of art, there is a learning process. When we first begin something new, we sometimes get lucky with a “perfect” creation. However, consistently creating something with very few technical flaws takes time and a LOT of practice. And when we share our work on Facebook, you will probably only hear the good feedback. The unskilled can see through the flaws to the beauty, but there are still going to be flaws. And when we only hear the good, we start to think that we are amazing. And those who do post negative comments are usually shunned (and they are oftentimes trolls, so their opinions should not even be respected). I personally will never give negative critique unless it is requested, and I assume that most reasonable people follow that way of thinking as well.
So here is my request: If you are asked to critique someone’s work, PLEASE BE HONEST! Tell them the good, and the bad. Give constructive critique, it will help them grow.
Editors Note: Join our G+ Community for critiques and inspiration.
In my opinion, we need balance. I may be an experienced photographer, but when it comes to pottery, a very serious hobby of mine, I am still in the early learning stages. I recently posted a few photos on Facebook of some mug designs I have been working on, and while I know they are flawed, I only heard wonderful things in the comments on Facebook. Not that I’m complaining, it’s always great to hear positive feedback! Yet I know that they are not perfect and could use a lot of refinement (technically and aesthetically), and while that doesn’t necessarily make them less beautiful, I know they could be improved. I would love to have my work critiqued by a professional potter, a real, honest critique! I can take it. After all, how else am I going to improve?
These are a few of my recent pottery mugs, in case you were wondering. :)