While there has yet to be a true “dump” of snow in West Michigan, I went back and looked at some older photos recently, pulling up this photograph from Fallasburg Bridge in Lowell, MI. Utilizing a NiSi 10-stop neutral density filter (B&H | Amazon), I was able to get a new, unique view of the bridge I had photographed so many times before.
Composing at chest height
I played around with a few different angles — both vertical and horizontal — to see if I could get “the shot” I desired. I wasn’t sure what that was at first. I knew I wanted to make the water still enough to get a good reflection of the bridge, so I started with a few longer exposures at first, taken at about chest-height.
But then I saw the water, and the leaves and textures in the foreground, swirling and moving towards the bridge. I knew that I had to capture this — it was that special part of the scene that I had to have in my photograph.
I decided to go with a shorter exposure — a mere four seconds. And I was liking what I was getting. I could see the movement in the water but still had an exposure long enough to get a pretty good reflection of the bridge in the water.
Getting low
From there, I decided to go low. I put my tripod legs to their lowest position and turned my camera vertical, so I would get the water and sky to be even in my shot, which helped to create a balance in my photograph.
I kept that same four-second exposure and ended up with the photograph of the day.
Sometimes shooting at eye level works, but getting low can bring out some details that will make your photo shine! For me, the movement in the water really helped to bring life to the photograph.
Thanks for your clear story explaining how you came to this result, which is in my eyes very beautiful (and professional). However how does this fit into the rule of thirds.
Hey Henk – Thank you! Once you know the rules, you can break them :) Not every photograph needs to follow every rule, and this is a great example of that. Especially when it comes to landscape, being able to showcase what I see is more important (to me anyway) than following the rule of thirds, etc. By putting the bridge smack dab in the middle of the scene, that allows it to truly shine.
Thanks for your clear story explaining how you came to this result, which is in my eyes very beautiful (and professional). However how does this fit into the rule of thirds.
Hey Henk – Thank you! Once you know the rules, you can break them :) Not every photograph needs to follow every rule, and this is a great example of that. Especially when it comes to landscape, being able to showcase what I see is more important (to me anyway) than following the rule of thirds, etc. By putting the bridge smack dab in the middle of the scene, that allows it to truly shine.
Thanks for your clear story explaining how you came to this result, which is in my eyes very beautiful (and professional). However how does this fit into the rule of thirds.