IMG_3328

There are some lenses I just feel bad for. They’re neglected, under appreciated, under utilized all while the stars (like the 70-200 2.8 IS II USM) get all the love. Well, today I’m going to give a little ode to my unsung hero: my Canon 17-40 f4L USM.

It may seem a slightly unlikely fellow to win my affections. Certainly other photographers raise an eyebrow at me when I tell them how much I love it. Why not the 16-35 2.8 L they ask? Why? I’ll tell you why!

I’ve tried the 16-35 from time to time. I want to like it. I really do. But every time I play PJ faves 024with it, I feel the distortion is a little too much coupled with the bokeh of the 2.8.  Something about how they match up doesn’t quite sit well with me. And frankly, if I’m using a wide angle lens, I’m using it to be WIDE. If I want a 35 or 40 mm focal length, my 35 prime is going to get the love.

The 17-40 gives me just the right amount of distortion to accentuate what I’m looking to do. Whether it’s elongating tree branches, accentuating a long train of a bridal gown, capturing the undulating curves of the shoreline, my 17-40mm nails it.

PM Formals 085But Lisa, what about utilizing the fastness of the 16-35mm? Getting to 2.8 is wayyy better than f4. FALSE. Not everything needs to be shot wide open to awe and inspire. When I choose to use my 17-40, it’s because I want to capture the sweeping beauty of something–not blur it to high heaven with bokeh. I don’t need that extra stop.

The only weakness I find in my 17-40 is that it tends to give me more chromatic aberration than other lenses. Logically, this makes sense with the wider angle lens & EL Bride Groom Formals 008more distortion of light so I can forgive that weakness. Thankfully though, Lightroom, Aperture, and a zillion different plug ins have made dealing with chromatic aberrations pretty darn easy.

The best part of my unsung hero? While the 16-35 clocks in at $1699 retail, the 17-40 is a cool $840. That’s over 50% LESS. I like my lenses and I can be a gear nerd, but sometimes, you just have to do what makes plain old business sense. For the applications I utilize this focal length for, the 17-40 has my vote.

Angela and Ryan

Lisa is a D.C. based wedding photographer. Get the latest on Facebook or follow her on Twitter.
______

This Post Sponsored by:

Photoshop World, the ultimate Photoshop, Photography & Lighting Conference. Atlanta GA, April 8-10.  Use the promo code PSWFOCUS414 to discount $50 OFF a full conference pass. Learn more in three days than you have in three years! 

ViewBug  Stick With ViewBug & Photofocus throughout 2014 – because we’re announcing the biggest contest in Photofocus history — coming soon!

The HDR Learning Center Check out new ways to use High Dynamic Range photography to make compelling images. Free tutorials and posts to get results. Produced in partnership with HDRsoft.

Mosaic A complete solution for photographers using Lightroom who want to manage and share their photos. You can easily view images with their iOS app or web service. Plus your photos are backed up to the cloud with several plans to match your needs. Be sure to also check out the Lightroom Learning Center to learn new ways to work in Lightroom.

lynda.com Learn photography anytime, anywhere, and at your own pace—from bite-sized tutorials to comprehensive courses. Try lynda.com free for 10 days by visiting lynda.com/ Photofocus.

The Topaz Labs Image Enhancement bundle. Open up a world of creative possibilities with a seamless, integrated workflow. You don’t need to be a Photoshop wizard to look like one. Click here and use the code photofocus to get a 15% discount.

Join the conversation! 13 Comments

  1. I shoot sports and architecture. And, the 17-40 is my primary lens for architecture. It’s also the lens I go to for wide stadium shots at sporting events. F4 is plenty wide for me, since I’m typically shooting between f8-11 when I use it. I only paid $625 for it when it came out, but it’s actually appreciated in value!

    Reply
  2. I’ll have to agree that this is a fantastic lens for the price and it’s really versatile. I love to take it when I travel. I just wanted to add from my experience when shooting architecture or landscapes the corners are pretty soft. Not a big issue for portraits but sometimes frustrating when I need the details in there.

    Reply
  3. I LOVE THIS PHOTO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The color, the happiness, the “cowboy” the boots-everything. I love it!

    Reply
  4. I had one of the 17-40 F4L lenses, great little lens and it was a big step up from my Canon kit lens that I had been using for so long. Got it off eBay for a bargain, sold it on for the same amount a few months down the line. It was my first experience with the Canon L series lenses and it highlighted to me how good they are optically, a very nice introduction indeed.

    Reply
  5. […] Read the original post: Canon 17-40 f4L USM: My Unsung Hero | Photofocus […]

    Reply
  6. […] Read this article: Canon 17-40 f4L USM: My Unsung Hero | Photofocus […]

    Reply
  7. I like my experience so far with my 17-40, I think. I use it on my 5D III and compare it to my Sigma 10-20 4.0-5.6 on my trusty old 40D. The Sigma / 40D combo is pretty sweet – sharp, great for 3 exposure HDRs for landscapes. I think my only concern is some funky results using a circular polarizer on the 17-40 – I probably maybe need a thinner, wider circ PL. If I am out shooting a full day of landscapes, I will take the 40D with the Sigma 10-20 lens and the 5D with the 24-105 4.0L lens. Those cover a lot of ground, literally and figuratively.

    Reply
  8. No question, the 17-40L is on my 5DmkII much of the time when I’m out doing landscapes.

    Reply
  9. […] .Lisa is a D.C. based wedding photographer. Get the latest on Facebook or follow her on Twitter.This Post Sponsored by:Photoshop World , the ultimate Photoshop, Photography & Lighting Conference. Atlanta GA, April 8-10. Use the promo code Read full article […]

    Reply
  10. what about closest focus distance? is lowest for the 16-35 or for the 17-40? I use an old 20-35 Canon but the closest focus distance is something around 50 cm… too much!

    Reply
  11. Agreed! The 17-40L is a great lens, and a great value as well. A classic for landscapes.

    Reply
  12. […] child standing on me). I was anxious at first as this is totally unorthodox to ME, but I put on my trusty 17-40 and let it do it’s magic. By lowering the camera body but still keeping the angle of my lens […]

    Reply

Let us know your thoughts...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

About Lisa Robinson

Co-Founder and Lead Photographer of SoftBox Media Photography in 2006. We provide top-notch, award winning wedding & portrait services to the D.C. area & beyond.

Category

Gear, Photography, Wedding

Tags