We live in an ultra connected world where the amount of media seemingly free for the taking is virtually unlimited. This is not a rant on stealing, fair use or copyrights for that matter. It’s really some thoughts on creating and sharing work. Photographers are content creators just like musicians, writers, sculptors, painters and every other artist. Just as one kind of artist might not be skilled in another one’s field, it doesn’t mean they can appropriate someone else’s work into their own.

Done Often Doesn’t Mean Done Right

We all see videos on YouTube that use music that is not licensed for use in that work. People seem to think that because it’s on the Internet or on their computer it’s OK to use in a derivative work.

It’s not OK. Actually it’s illegal. Copyright violation is a Federal crime. The “I-didn’t-know-it-was-copyrighted” defense doesn’t work. Ever. It falls under the ignorance-of-the-law-is-no-excuse rule.

What Can You Do?

So a photographer (in this case me), wants to make a video that shows the entire take of a shoot. I have two options. One is to produce it as a silent movie. It might work or it might be super boring.

Take a look at my “first pass.” Don’t worry it’s only fifty-three seconds long.

What Should You Do?

The second option is to license music.

Once upon a time, I did a three projector slide show showcasing a trip I had made to Brussels, Belgium. I used Gershwin’s “American in Paris” as the soundtrack. I showed the work to the managing director of Sabena Airlines. He loved it and wanted to take it all over the South to promote the news that Atlanta now was served by an international carrier.

Yep. It was a loooonnnnggg time ago. Even then, I knew that I did not own the rights to use the music so I called the agency handling that music and explained what I wanted to do. They were happy to grant a license–for $1,500.00 in mid-eighties money. Sabena said “No thanks” on that one. Ultimately I got them to pay for original music which was a lot cheaper than the license.

Living in Today’s World

Fast forward to the present. Photographers, especially wedding, event and boudoir photographers, animate their work beautifully, flowing to the beats and melodies with breathtaking transitions.

These videos are part of the deliverables for their customers; sometimes on a thumb drive or on a website like YouTube or Vimeo. This music has to be licensed. It is so public now that finding violators is relatively easy. Photographer’s can avoid problems and embarrassment that having a client receive a desist letter and an invoice for copyright infringement brings.

There are music licensing options now that are quite affordable.

I talked with Roy Ashen from Triple Scoop Music at this year’s Imaging USA. He explained that music for photographers is available for about $60.00 a song. That’s in today’s dollars. Sixty bucks. Look at and hear the difference a soundtrack makes in the same video (well almost. I redid the credits which added eight seconds.)

This video worked as a silent piece. It really works with music.


This Post Sponsored by:

The Digital Camera Store At Amazon

Join the conversation! 7 Comments

  1. Reblogged this on MBT Photo Gallery and commented:
    Great information!

  2. I, plus I am sure many other Wedding photographers think $60 for a song is a little bit expensive!!

    • And how much do you charge for your photos? There are lots of artists who give their work away via Creative Commons and you’re welcome to always try to hire a musician for less. But go ahead and violate copyright. You’ll find it a lot more expensive than $60. This is a charge that you should build into your costs when determining prices for your client.

  3. The market has come a long way for licensing music for commercial users. But for amateurs there still is no good options. The music that comes with FCP X is pretty good but everyone has access and you quickly get tired of the songs you like. (All my soccer highlights videos from my son’s team last season have the same 4 songs) Not to mention Youtube now frequently flags even the FCP X music requiring the tiring dispute process.

    Paying $60 per song to show a video or slideshow to a few friends can get expensive real fast. There are some free options – even Youtube itself has some free music – but we need more options. Probably will never happen.

  4. $60 is well worth it. It becomes either pay now or pay more later. Thank you Rich.


Let us know your thoughts...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

About Kevin Ames

Photography is life. Kevin Ames is living it to the fullest. His career encompasses commercial photography, authoring books on Photoshop, Lightroom, as well as on photographing women, two magazine columns (Digital Photographer’s Notebook) in Photoshop User, (Lighting Photographer’s Handbook) in Light It! and speaking engagements in the U.S., Canada, Europe and Asia at Photoshop World, WPPI and Photo Plus Expo. Through it all he maintains his studio in Atlanta, Georgia working with clients including A.T.&T., Westin Hotels and Honda Power Equipment. His work has appeared in the Wall Street Journal, Time, Atlanta Sports and Fitness and exhibited at Atlanta’s High Museum of Art and on corporate websites, brochures and catalogs. Kevin is a Sigma Pro and Dynalite VIP. Read his blogs on: and


Cinematography, Opinion