<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aperture 3.0 &#8211; Very Cool But NOT Ready For Prime Time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photofocus.com/2010/02/17/aperture-3-0-very-cool-but-not-ready-for-prime-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photofocus.com/2010/02/17/aperture-3-0-very-cool-but-not-ready-for-prime-time/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:39:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Secrecy Always A Good Thing? The Tale of Apple Aperture vs Adobe Lightroom &#171; kwanghui.com</title>
		<link>http://photofocus.com/2010/02/17/aperture-3-0-very-cool-but-not-ready-for-prime-time/#comment-27161</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Is Secrecy Always A Good Thing? The Tale of Apple Aperture vs Adobe Lightroom &#171; kwanghui.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 04:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photofocus.com/?p=8865#comment-27161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] I learnt that Apple&#8217;s secrecy was also a concern raised by various photography blogs (e.g., http://photofocus.com/2010/02/17/aperture-3-0-very-cool-but-not-ready-for-prime-time/). Moreover, the extensive fixes that were made soon after Aperture&#8217;s release shouldn&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I learnt that Apple&#8217;s secrecy was also a concern raised by various photography blogs (e.g., <a href="http://photofocus.com/2010/02/17/aperture-3-0-very-cool-but-not-ready-for-prime-time/" rel="nofollow">http://photofocus.com/2010/02/17/aperture-3-0-very-cool-but-not-ready-for-prime-time/</a>). Moreover, the extensive fixes that were made soon after Aperture&#8217;s release shouldn&#8217;t [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Workflow: Updated!</title>
		<link>http://photofocus.com/2010/02/17/aperture-3-0-very-cool-but-not-ready-for-prime-time/#comment-25127</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Workflow: Updated!]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photofocus.com/?p=8865#comment-25127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] yet, so I’ve had a major overhaul of my workflow. You can read about the failings of Aperture 3 here, and I’m sure many of you have experienced it first hand. I love Apple, but I’m gonna leave [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] yet, so I’ve had a major overhaul of my workflow. You can read about the failings of Aperture 3 here, and I’m sure many of you have experienced it first hand. I love Apple, but I’m gonna leave [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Positive Response to Aperture 3.02 &#124; The Aperture Blog</title>
		<link>http://photofocus.com/2010/02/17/aperture-3-0-very-cool-but-not-ready-for-prime-time/#comment-20788</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Positive Response to Aperture 3.02 &#124; The Aperture Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 09:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photofocus.com/?p=8865#comment-20788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] had previously been harsh in his criticism of the software&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] had previously been harsh in his criticism of the software&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Secrecy Always A Good Thing? The Tale of Apple Aperture vs Adobe Lightroom : Core Economics</title>
		<link>http://photofocus.com/2010/02/17/aperture-3-0-very-cool-but-not-ready-for-prime-time/#comment-20683</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Is Secrecy Always A Good Thing? The Tale of Apple Aperture vs Adobe Lightroom : Core Economics]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 07:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photofocus.com/?p=8865#comment-20683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] I learnt that Apple&#8217;s secrecy was also a concern raised by various photography blogs (e.g., http://photofocus.com/2010/02/17/aperture-3-0-very-cool-but-not-ready-for-prime-time/). Moreover, the extensive fixes that were made soon after Aperture&#8217;s release shouldn&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I learnt that Apple&#8217;s secrecy was also a concern raised by various photography blogs (e.g., <a href="http://photofocus.com/2010/02/17/aperture-3-0-very-cool-but-not-ready-for-prime-time/" rel="nofollow">http://photofocus.com/2010/02/17/aperture-3-0-very-cool-but-not-ready-for-prime-time/</a>). Moreover, the extensive fixes that were made soon after Aperture&#8217;s release shouldn&#8217;t [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Backward Forward quilt &#171; Film and Thread</title>
		<link>http://photofocus.com/2010/02/17/aperture-3-0-very-cool-but-not-ready-for-prime-time/#comment-20491</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Backward Forward quilt &#171; Film and Thread]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 01:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photofocus.com/?p=8865#comment-20491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] for the Aperture users &#8211; a lot of the reports I&#8217;ve seen give some pretty discouraging information about the upgrade to Aperture 3 process, so I am going to hold off until I see if a software update comes along that will address [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for the Aperture users &#8211; a lot of the reports I&#8217;ve seen give some pretty discouraging information about the upgrade to Aperture 3 process, so I am going to hold off until I see if a software update comes along that will address [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A few different treatments of a few different photos of one very special lady &#124; Michael Shane&#39;s geekery, photography, and shenanigans</title>
		<link>http://photofocus.com/2010/02/17/aperture-3-0-very-cool-but-not-ready-for-prime-time/#comment-20481</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A few different treatments of a few different photos of one very special lady &#124; Michael Shane&#39;s geekery, photography, and shenanigans]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 06:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photofocus.com/?p=8865#comment-20481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] one new photo using some custom presets in Aperture 3. I agree with Scott Bourne that Aperture 3 is definitely slower than its predecessor in some ways. That said, it&#8217;s also true that Aperture 3 could [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] one new photo using some custom presets in Aperture 3. I agree with Scott Bourne that Aperture 3 is definitely slower than its predecessor in some ways. That said, it&#8217;s also true that Aperture 3 could [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top Posts &#8212; WordPress.com</title>
		<link>http://photofocus.com/2010/02/17/aperture-3-0-very-cool-but-not-ready-for-prime-time/#comment-20480</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Top Posts &#8212; WordPress.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 00:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photofocus.com/?p=8865#comment-20480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  Aperture 3.0 &#8211; Very Cool But NOT Ready For Prime Time If you&#8217;ve been following me for any length of time, you know that I was one of the early proponents of Aperture. [...] [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Aperture 3.0 &#8211; Very Cool But NOT Ready For Prime Time If you&#8217;ve been following me for any length of time, you know that I was one of the early proponents of Aperture. [...] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

