0 comments on “New Canon Rebel & Flash

  1. That’s quite a package for $799.99. It’s enough of an upgrade that I will be selling my XSi and purchasing the T1i (what’s up with the name?). The video of a Mark II, the image quality of a 50D, and the small size of a rebel, loving it.

  2. More like cut into the D90 sales.

    50D is for a different market with its more rugged construction and AF etc…and there are plenty of photogs that would consider video a bug and not a feature, I think, as well.

  3. More like cut into the D90 sales.

    50D is for a different market with its more rugged construction and AF etc…and there are plenty of photogs that would consider video a bug and not a feature, I think, as well.

  4. Sounds nice but I think I would have been happier with 12MP. Those 15MP RAW files will require a lot of disk space.

  5. Sounds nice but I think I would have been happier with 12MP. Those 15MP RAW files will require a lot of disk space.

  6. Ahh marketing speak: “Peripheral Illumination Correction” “Auto Lighting Optimiser” stupid names for what sounds like some interesting technologies. I can see it being useful for the happy snaps shot as jpg, but I wonder how this data will be baked into the RAW image?

  7. Ahh marketing speak: “Peripheral Illumination Correction” “Auto Lighting Optimiser” stupid names for what sounds like some interesting technologies. I can see it being useful for the happy snaps shot as jpg, but I wonder how this data will be baked into the RAW image?

  8. Does seem like this’ll end up cannibalizing 50D sales, doesn’t it? The only real diff that i can see is the slower continuous shooting rate (and perhaps the tougher build quality on the 50D).

  9. Does seem like this’ll end up cannibalizing 50D sales, doesn’t it? The only real diff that i can see is the slower continuous shooting rate (and perhaps the tougher build quality on the 50D).

  10. this is so cool. I don’t have any money, and now my rebel is 5 generations old, not 4, but it’s great that canon is coming out with this stuff. It started to seem like the nikon bodies were pulling away, but those specs at that price is great. cant wait for the dpreview.

    thanks for sharing so promptly scott.
    I love following twipphoto.com

    Stephen

  11. I am just starting to get into the video capabilities with my 5D. Maybe I should buy my daughter this Rebel and have her teach me…lol.

  12. I am just starting to get into the video capabilities with my 5D. Maybe I should buy my daughter this Rebel and have her teach me…lol.

  13. Wow I might trade in my XTi for this camera. Does it accept compact flash too or is it just Secure digital and Secure Digital High Density? You mention full HD but in the specs just above where it mentions it you do not list 1080 video. Anyways, I love it for a great entry level camera. I have not used SD cards in a while. How many GB do SD cards go up to? Can’t wait to hear everyones comments on the podcast. But does this mean that canon is fighting back against Nikon and finally producing better cameras. One more question. How will those extended ISO look for low light? But I might wait till they fix the dark spots problem that has come out with every camera for the past year. Thanks for the post. I will be following this camera closely.

  14. Wow I might trade in my XTi for this camera. Does it accept compact flash too or is it just Secure digital and Secure Digital High Density? You mention full HD but in the specs just above where it mentions it you do not list 1080 video. Anyways, I love it for a great entry level camera. I have not used SD cards in a while. How many GB do SD cards go up to? Can’t wait to hear everyones comments on the podcast. But does this mean that canon is fighting back against Nikon and finally producing better cameras. One more question. How will those extended ISO look for low light? But I might wait till they fix the dark spots problem that has come out with every camera for the past year. Thanks for the post. I will be following this camera closely.

  15. Well, in true RAW files NOTHING gets “baked in.” It ‘s the information straight from the sensor with some additional metadata. If you’re using Canon’s software to process your RAW files, you will probably see those corrections, but they *should* be fully reversible. If you use Aperture or Lightroom, you probably won’t see the *benefits* of those features in your RAW files, since they probably won’t be able to read the specific metadata tags associated with those settings.

  16. Well, in true RAW files NOTHING gets “baked in.” It ‘s the information straight from the sensor with some additional metadata. If you’re using Canon’s software to process your RAW files, you will probably see those corrections, but they *should* be fully reversible. If you use Aperture or Lightroom, you probably won’t see the *benefits* of those features in your RAW files, since they probably won’t be able to read the specific metadata tags associated with those settings.

  17. “Full HD 1080p video capture at 20 fps” – 20 frames per second at 1920×1080? Either this is a typo in their press release or the Full HD movie isn’t worth much and the marketing guys won the vote on what makes sense.

  18. “Full HD 1080p video capture at 20 fps” – 20 frames per second at 1920×1080? Either this is a typo in their press release or the Full HD movie isn’t worth much and the marketing guys won the vote on what makes sense.

  19. It’s actually a camera from the future sent back in time to kill John Connor. For $800 though I for one will welcome out new Skynet overlords (if they could bump up that full HD video by a couple of frames per second, wtf standard is 20?).

  20. It’s actually a camera from the future sent back in time to kill John Connor. For $800 though I for one will welcome out new Skynet overlords (if they could bump up that full HD video by a couple of frames per second, wtf standard is 20?).

  21. Pingback: PhotoGeek Week#85 Vote with your remote | photogeek.tv Podcast for the geek photographer professional prosumer or keen beginner

  22. Pingback: PhotoGeek Week#85 Vote with your remote | photogeek.tv Podcast for the geek photographer professional prosumer or keen beginner

  23. As Scott would say: sounds good on paper, but let’s wait until people test the real production version.

  24. As Scott would say: sounds good on paper, but let’s wait until people test the real production version.

  25. From Kss [...]As Scott would say: sounds good on paper, but let’s wait until people test the real production version. [...]

    Disappointingly, I suspect the latest trend of manufacturer bashing will have the various blogs complaining before the majority of people even get their hands on one. Canon is the new Microsoft of the camera world. It is in fashion to complain about them in particular.

  26. From Kss [...]As Scott would say: sounds good on paper, but let’s wait until people test the real production version. [...]

    Disappointingly, I suspect the latest trend of manufacturer bashing will have the various blogs complaining before the majority of people even get their hands on one. Canon is the new Microsoft of the camera world. It is in fashion to complain about them in particular.

  27. I don’t think anyone should be forming judgments for or against this or any camera until they actually get their hands on one. I will test one as soon as they are available and report back here.

    And Jack I made no commentary whatsoever about the camera. I posted the press release without comment so the blogs you are talking about – this isn’t one of them.

  28. I don’t think anyone should be forming judgments for or against this or any camera until they actually get their hands on one. I will test one as soon as they are available and report back here.

    And Jack I made no commentary whatsoever about the camera. I posted the press release without comment so the blogs you are talking about – this isn’t one of them.

  29. Just the marketing people playing fast and loose with the “Full HD” label, 720p at 30/fps is “Full HD”, 1080p at 20 fps is NOT, and “Kinda Full HD” is not a good marketing term.

    Also they don’t want to cut into 5D Mark II sales.

  30. Just the marketing people playing fast and loose with the “Full HD” label, 720p at 30/fps is “Full HD”, 1080p at 20 fps is NOT, and “Kinda Full HD” is not a good marketing term.

    Also they don’t want to cut into 5D Mark II sales.

  31. Looks like a great entry level dslr, but it really speaks to how rushed the 50d seemed. I shoot with a 40d, and I can’t say I’ve felt one bit like upgrading to the 50d. Now the 5DM2, that’s the hot sauce :)

  32. Looks like a great entry level dslr, but it really speaks to how rushed the 50d seemed. I shoot with a 40d, and I can’t say I’ve felt one bit like upgrading to the 50d. Now the 5DM2, that’s the hot sauce :)

  33. These High Iso shots are very grainy. Not looking too good for myself buying one of these.

  34. These High Iso shots are very grainy. Not looking too good for myself buying one of these.

  35. I’m a Nikon shooter and I think this is great. It’s nice to see these features make their way into entry-level DSLRs. It will be interesting to see how Nikon responds. An updated D60 perhaps? Either way the consumer wins. Yay us!

  36. I’m a Nikon shooter and I think this is great. It’s nice to see these features make their way into entry-level DSLRs. It will be interesting to see how Nikon responds. An updated D60 perhaps? Either way the consumer wins. Yay us!

  37. Pingback: Canon Rebel T1i entry level DSLR offers video recording with compromise

  38. Pingback: Canon Rebel T1i entry level DSLR offers video recording with compromise

  39. 20fps is an odd beast. It’s such a bizarre choice that I wonder what was going on if it’s not a typo. I suppose they had to have 1080p something for marketing purposes, but couldn’t let the thing upstage the 5DII by allowing it to have a frame rate that’s useful. 720p is a pretty good resolution too though.

    However, I am interested, it’s an easier price to take, and the Gizmodo preview images look pretty hopeful to me. Now it’s time to wait for more aggressive testing and comparisons.

  40. 20fps is an odd beast. It’s such a bizarre choice that I wonder what was going on if it’s not a typo. I suppose they had to have 1080p something for marketing purposes, but couldn’t let the thing upstage the 5DII by allowing it to have a frame rate that’s useful. 720p is a pretty good resolution too though.

    However, I am interested, it’s an easier price to take, and the Gizmodo preview images look pretty hopeful to me. Now it’s time to wait for more aggressive testing and comparisons.

  41. To all the people saying this will cannibalize 50D sales, the Rebel and xxD ( 30D, 40D, 50D etc…) cameras are not in the same ballpark. Build quality, shot quality, size, ergonomics, fps and other things all make the xxD series Pro level ( albeit low end pro level ) cameras while the Rebels maintain a pretty consistent enthusiast/amateur base. Try holding a Rebel and then a 50D, you’ll see what I mean.

  42. To all the people saying this will cannibalize 50D sales, the Rebel and xxD ( 30D, 40D, 50D etc…) cameras are not in the same ballpark. Build quality, shot quality, size, ergonomics, fps and other things all make the xxD series Pro level ( albeit low end pro level ) cameras while the Rebels maintain a pretty consistent enthusiast/amateur base. Try holding a Rebel and then a 50D, you’ll see what I mean.

  43. I was going for a 450D…and talked my friend into getting one. Good feature set, but OMG does it have a super cheap plasticy build and feel. (Even makes my 350D seem robust by comparison.)
    Since the 500D is the same build, I’ll be paying the couple hundred extra for a 50D to get a more solid cam…(and I also like the larger, easier to grip feel of the 50D).
    The feature list of the T1i is very nice, but my sense is that Canon is packing too much tech into this camera (and the 450D), and maintaining an entry price point at the expense of build quality.
    Just my 2¢… ;)

  44. I was going for a 450D…and talked my friend into getting one. Good feature set, but OMG does it have a super cheap plasticy build and feel. (Even makes my 350D seem robust by comparison.)
    Since the 500D is the same build, I’ll be paying the couple hundred extra for a 50D to get a more solid cam…(and I also like the larger, easier to grip feel of the 50D).
    The feature list of the T1i is very nice, but my sense is that Canon is packing too much tech into this camera (and the 450D), and maintaining an entry price point at the expense of build quality.
    Just my 2¢… ;)

  45. Btw, I am basing MHO on the preview of the 500d on DPReview.com…the photos look very similar and reviewers commented that it uses the same build as the 450D, but I suppose it could be different than the 450. Have to wait til it hits the shelves… :)

  46. I don’t think one can get wrapped up in build quality very much. I know people who are still shooting with original Rebels – which are what, five or so years old now? At least four I think. I myself am still shooting with an XTi that is in its third year (and probably over 30k clicks at this point) – the Rebels can take a licking and keep on ticking in my (admittedly limited) experience – I have a friend who’s had her XT for longer than I have and it too is still ticking!

  47. I don’t think one can get wrapped up in build quality very much. I know people who are still shooting with original Rebels – which are what, five or so years old now? At least four I think. I myself am still shooting with an XTi that is in its third year (and probably over 30k clicks at this point) – the Rebels can take a licking and keep on ticking in my (admittedly limited) experience – I have a friend who’s had her XT for longer than I have and it too is still ticking!

  48. Well, seems very nice. The frame rate at 1080p seems low, but given the price that’s a nice compromise. I’m in the market for my next camera and was going to save my pennies for the 50D Mk II because I have a lot of Canon glass. I was actually thinking of a Nikon D90, but this thing seems to be a direct assault on that camera. I’ll stay tuned, but if it performs as advertised my investment in lenses may drive me to this rather than the D90…we’ll see.

Comments are closed.