22 comments on “Nik Silver Efex Pro Mini Review

  1. That price definitely puts it out of the hands of the average enthusiast. I’ll have to try it out to see what advantages it offers beyond the B&W presets I the ability to create in Lightroom. Thanks for the review.

  2. I have been using Lightroom and Power Retouch for black and white conversions but Silver Efex Pro is as they used to say is ‘The Bee’s Knee’s’ the pre-sets are first class and can be changed at will and as you said a good starting point, I also like the way an antique effect can be created, the toning is great too and infinitely flexible, the web site videos should be looked at, very informative, although it is not cheap I purchased it and would recommend anybody serious about black and white to go for, they wont regret it, just one other thing, it seems to retain highlights and shadows very well when you manipulate.

  3. Scott,

    I’m already using Viveza within Aperture and am looking at Color Efex Pro. Do you know if Nik plans to port Dfine for use with Aperture? If not, what sharpening tools do you use?

  4. @Jeff Lynch DFine is noise reduction. When I have sharpness problems, which is rare, I export to Photoshop and use Nik Sharpener Pro. I find the sharpening within Aperture to be adequate most of the time. As for Noise reduction, same situation. I export to Photoshop and use DFine.

  5. I’m trying the Demo and I’m tempted to buy it but $199 is too much as I can do most of this in PS-CS3. If they sold this plugin for $99 I bet they would make a LOT more $ in total.

  6. @Jeff M I agree. I have always found Nik Software to be very high quality but their pricing structure puts their stuff out of reach for all but the pro and serious amateur. As a pro I have no problem with it. The time savings alone makes it worth the money. But for the person who spent the same money on Aperture, it has to be a bit of a stumbling block.

  7. The demos look great. I currently use LR and PS3, and see the advantages of this plug-in.

    As a hobbyist the price is high for me – could TWIP negotiate a ‘special limited time price’? Thanks.

  8. I agree. The application looks great and it’s a package I would love to own and use both w/ photoshop and Apple Aperture. Unfortunately their pricing, even w the NAPP discount is too high. If it were $99, I’d buy it in a heartbeat, $150 to $200 is too expensive, even though it is quite nice.

  9. is anyone experiencing perfomance issues? i discovered, with another 8-core mac pro user, that there are still a few bugs to be ironed out, but apart from that you cant beat the results.

    images take a very long time to load on my machine, and the plugin is very sluggish.

  10. Rhys;
    I am not experiencing intolerable performance on my 2.16ghz iMAC but I have noticed that by taking a regular 18MB file and using the plug-in as a “Smart Filter” the file is now 108MB!

  11. @Scott I think you’d have a lot of fun with TrueGrain http://grubbasoftware.com a bit more for the b&w gourmet and more granular control based on a wavelength graph. Oh and it doesn’t simulate grain. It uses actual scans of various exposures and sizes.

  12. @Ryhs
    I have experienced this very slow performance that you speak of and after doing a bit of research, what I’ve found is that the plug in (Aperture only) has issues opening RAW 40D and 5D image files. Try it on a JPG and it works just fine. Likewise, I have no issues opening 20D RAW images. I’ve made Nik aware of this and they’re looking in to it. Hopefully they will have a fix out soon.

  13. Pingback: TWIP » TWIP Podcast #40 - DNG

  14. Follow-Up. Great product. Only problem is terrible performance as an Apple Aperture plug-in. Launches fine the first time then gets progressively slower each additional time, even on a MacPro w/ 8Gig of RAM. Unacceptable. Sounds like a major memory leak somewhere. Took 10 minutes to load from Aperture the other night. Like Gary S pointed out, this seems to be linked to the larger Canon 40D and 5D raw images, though my 8 MP 1D Mark II images also seemed slower. I’ll definitely buy it if they can get this fixed soon.

  15. @Jeff that doesn’t match my experience at all working on a 24″ iMac w/4 Gigs RAM. It’s not slow at all for me. Certainly not fast, but nowhere near as dire as you describe it – again – in my experience.

  16. Scott, glad to hear the Aperture plug-in is working fine for you. It works for me on my 30D and 1D2 raw files, as well as scanned files, but it slows to a crawl trying to handle the 14 bit Canon 40D raw files. And it’s fine from w/in photoshop, it only seems to be slowing down so badly when launched via Aperture. Very strange. I want to buy it, I like it that much, but not if I can’t use it from Aperture on newer/larger raw files.

  17. I had been experiencing terrible performance with Silver Efex Pro as an Aperture addin (was OK in Photoshop.) Nik has recently released an update version 1.001 which seems nice and zippy as an Aperture addin now– much faster than the Photoshop version in fact. I was really disappointed with the Apterture perfromance when I first got this software– it was basically unusable– very happy that Nik seem to have recognized and fixed the problem pretty quickly.

  18. I agree w/ JMT. I just got an email from Nik in response to the issue I raised w/ them about poor Aperture performance. Earlier this week they released version 1.001 to address the issue.

  19. Pingback: TWIP » TWIP Photo Software Product of the Year Award

  20. On the strength of the TWIPpers reviews of the NIK software I lashed out and bought the entire software bundle… a great leap of faith loading my Credit Card details and hitting the send button… half an hour later I was kicking myself …. that I hadn’t done it earlier.

    I LOVE the entire bundle and they have made my workflow so much more streamlined.. Thank you NIK and thank you TWIP.

    And congratulations to the NIK Silver Efex Pro on a well deserved award… Cheers G

  21. Pingback: TWIP » TWIP Podcast #60 - Full Crew

Comments are closed.