<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Future of Digital Sensors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photofocus.com/2008/06/28/534/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photofocus.com/2008/06/28/534/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:39:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly</title>
		<link>http://photofocus.com/2008/06/28/534/#comment-3869</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kelly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 17:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twipphoto.com/index.php/archives/534#comment-3869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a real estate photographer I&#039;m forced to rely on HDR instead of expensive and slow to set up strobes for shooting complicated interior photos. I&#039;m hoping hoping for expanded HDR options such as:
1. In camera HDR processing
2. A sensor that you could have a bracketed ISO feature. This would mean that for a single shot, so you would have 3-6 exposures each at a different ISO so the exposure would be bracketed without having to take multiple pictures.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a real estate photographer I&#8217;m forced to rely on HDR instead of expensive and slow to set up strobes for shooting complicated interior photos. I&#8217;m hoping hoping for expanded HDR options such as:<br />
1. In camera HDR processing<br />
2. A sensor that you could have a bracketed ISO feature. This would mean that for a single shot, so you would have 3-6 exposures each at a different ISO so the exposure would be bracketed without having to take multiple pictures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marketing Magic For Childrens Portrait Photography. &#124; 7Wins.eu</title>
		<link>http://photofocus.com/2008/06/28/534/#comment-3867</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marketing Magic For Childrens Portrait Photography. &#124; 7Wins.eu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 16:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twipphoto.com/index.php/archives/534#comment-3867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Quest » Blog Archive » The End Of A Black-And-White World: Color PhotographyTWIP » The Future of Digital Sensors - TWIP   Tags digital photography photography tip digital photo photography light wedding photography [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Quest » Blog Archive » The End Of A Black-And-White World: Color PhotographyTWIP » The Future of Digital Sensors &#8211; TWIP   Tags digital photography photography tip digital photo photography light wedding photography [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marketing Magic For Childrens Portrait Photography. &#124; 7Wins.eu</title>
		<link>http://photofocus.com/2008/06/28/534/#comment-3868</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marketing Magic For Childrens Portrait Photography. &#124; 7Wins.eu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 16:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twipphoto.com/index.php/archives/534#comment-3868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Quest » Blog Archive » The End Of A Black-And-White World: Color PhotographyTWIP » The Future of Digital Sensors - TWIP   Tags digital photography photography tip digital photo photography light wedding photography [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Quest » Blog Archive » The End Of A Black-And-White World: Color PhotographyTWIP » The Future of Digital Sensors &#8211; TWIP   Tags digital photography photography tip digital photo photography light wedding photography [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://photofocus.com/2008/06/28/534/#comment-3865</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 01:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twipphoto.com/index.php/archives/534#comment-3865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[a.	Making a small chip will always be cheaper than a big one. So full frame I think will always be relegated to the high end. Big sensor means bigger lens, compact cameras will always have small sensors.

b.	Price always goes down, non news.

c.	11+ stops in 5 years. No. Maybe 10-15. Maybe.

d.	Yah ISO has been going up a stop every generation or two. That will make sense.

e.	This one will come around about the time of 11+ stops of dynamic range. But I think floating point will be more probable.

f.	For most companies that don&#039;t have stabilized lenses already that&#039;s probably true. But why would Canon and Nikon change their way? Not in the next 5 years.

g.	I think megapixel madness is slowing as we speak. And even if it grows twice as fast we won&#039;t 100Mp in 5 years. Remember we are only talking 3 or so generations over 5 years.

h.	Not in SLRs! The bodies would have to get huge! (the size of high end camcorders) to fit 3 full frame sensors and all the prisms needed.

i.	I can see this one. Maybe not a coating but some kind of electrostatic screen so the sensor actually repels dust.

j.	Maybe in some applications, but I don&#039;t think it will be common. Especially in DSLRs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a.	Making a small chip will always be cheaper than a big one. So full frame I think will always be relegated to the high end. Big sensor means bigger lens, compact cameras will always have small sensors.</p>
<p>b.	Price always goes down, non news.</p>
<p>c.	11+ stops in 5 years. No. Maybe 10-15. Maybe.</p>
<p>d.	Yah ISO has been going up a stop every generation or two. That will make sense.</p>
<p>e.	This one will come around about the time of 11+ stops of dynamic range. But I think floating point will be more probable.</p>
<p>f.	For most companies that don&#8217;t have stabilized lenses already that&#8217;s probably true. But why would Canon and Nikon change their way? Not in the next 5 years.</p>
<p>g.	I think megapixel madness is slowing as we speak. And even if it grows twice as fast we won&#8217;t 100Mp in 5 years. Remember we are only talking 3 or so generations over 5 years.</p>
<p>h.	Not in SLRs! The bodies would have to get huge! (the size of high end camcorders) to fit 3 full frame sensors and all the prisms needed.</p>
<p>i.	I can see this one. Maybe not a coating but some kind of electrostatic screen so the sensor actually repels dust.</p>
<p>j.	Maybe in some applications, but I don&#8217;t think it will be common. Especially in DSLRs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://photofocus.com/2008/06/28/534/#comment-3866</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 01:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twipphoto.com/index.php/archives/534#comment-3866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[a.	Making a small chip will always be cheaper than a big one. So full frame I think will always be relegated to the high end. Big sensor means bigger lens, compact cameras will always have small sensors.

b.	Price always goes down, non news.

c.	11+ stops in 5 years. No. Maybe 10-15. Maybe.

d.	Yah ISO has been going up a stop every generation or two. That will make sense.

e.	This one will come around about the time of 11+ stops of dynamic range. But I think floating point will be more probable.

f.	For most companies that don&#039;t have stabilized lenses already that&#039;s probably true. But why would Canon and Nikon change their way? Not in the next 5 years.

g.	I think megapixel madness is slowing as we speak. And even if it grows twice as fast we won&#039;t 100Mp in 5 years. Remember we are only talking 3 or so generations over 5 years.

h.	Not in SLRs! The bodies would have to get huge! (the size of high end camcorders) to fit 3 full frame sensors and all the prisms needed.

i.	I can see this one. Maybe not a coating but some kind of electrostatic screen so the sensor actually repels dust.

j.	Maybe in some applications, but I don&#039;t think it will be common. Especially in DSLRs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a.	Making a small chip will always be cheaper than a big one. So full frame I think will always be relegated to the high end. Big sensor means bigger lens, compact cameras will always have small sensors.</p>
<p>b.	Price always goes down, non news.</p>
<p>c.	11+ stops in 5 years. No. Maybe 10-15. Maybe.</p>
<p>d.	Yah ISO has been going up a stop every generation or two. That will make sense.</p>
<p>e.	This one will come around about the time of 11+ stops of dynamic range. But I think floating point will be more probable.</p>
<p>f.	For most companies that don&#8217;t have stabilized lenses already that&#8217;s probably true. But why would Canon and Nikon change their way? Not in the next 5 years.</p>
<p>g.	I think megapixel madness is slowing as we speak. And even if it grows twice as fast we won&#8217;t 100Mp in 5 years. Remember we are only talking 3 or so generations over 5 years.</p>
<p>h.	Not in SLRs! The bodies would have to get huge! (the size of high end camcorders) to fit 3 full frame sensors and all the prisms needed.</p>
<p>i.	I can see this one. Maybe not a coating but some kind of electrostatic screen so the sensor actually repels dust.</p>
<p>j.	Maybe in some applications, but I don&#8217;t think it will be common. Especially in DSLRs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Willem</title>
		<link>http://photofocus.com/2008/06/28/534/#comment-3863</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Willem]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twipphoto.com/index.php/archives/534#comment-3863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your list doesn&#039;t surprise me at all if I think about it. It&#039;s more a question of which manufacturer will start with those improvements.
Besides that, you might even have forgotten some things. And as with all things in life; We&#039;ll see, or we won&#039;t.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your list doesn&#8217;t surprise me at all if I think about it. It&#8217;s more a question of which manufacturer will start with those improvements.<br />
Besides that, you might even have forgotten some things. And as with all things in life; We&#8217;ll see, or we won&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Willem</title>
		<link>http://photofocus.com/2008/06/28/534/#comment-3864</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Willem]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twipphoto.com/index.php/archives/534#comment-3864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your list doesn&#039;t surprise me at all if I think about it. It&#039;s more a question of which manufacturer will start with those improvements.
Besides that, you might even have forgotten some things. And as with all things in life; We&#039;ll see, or we won&#039;t.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your list doesn&#8217;t surprise me at all if I think about it. It&#8217;s more a question of which manufacturer will start with those improvements.<br />
Besides that, you might even have forgotten some things. And as with all things in life; We&#8217;ll see, or we won&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

