Skip to content

Finding Shelter

May 27, 2008
tags:

Family Portrait

I shot this photo at my son’s baptism (with Grandma and Grandpa). It was a very sunny day and Malakhi’s white outfit was peaking in nearly every image. I needed another location. Here’s what I looked for…a shady location with a fair bit of distance between where the subjects would stand and the background elements. Using a 50mm, 1.8 blurred the background while the diffuse lighting created rich tones. Getting Malakhi to look at the camera didn’t quite work out but Grandma and Grandpa were quite happy…and that’s all that counts, right? The upshot is that in every location, there will be good places and bad places to take photos. Following the action is one part of the process but also look for places that will make your job easier. In this case, I was looking for diffuse lighting and blurred backgrounds. When you know the elements you are looking for, it’s easier to find. The more you shoot consciously, the more these elements will present themselves to you.

31 Comments
  1. May 28, 2008 6:45 am

    Wonderful detail in the white outfit. At risk of sounding less manly, Malakhi looks friggin adorable.

    -C

  2. May 28, 2008 6:45 am

    Wonderful detail in the white outfit. At risk of sounding less manly, Malakhi looks friggin adorable.

    -C

  3. May 28, 2008 6:48 am

    This is one of the best tips. I have seen folks shooting with subjects squinting, and it drives me batty. Good job.

  4. May 28, 2008 6:48 am

    This is one of the best tips. I have seen folks shooting with subjects squinting, and it drives me batty. Good job.

  5. May 28, 2008 10:01 am

    I think your comment about the subjects being a fair distance from the background is key. You certainly need that extra distance so that you can blur the background enough to make your subjects the stars of the show.

  6. May 28, 2008 10:01 am

    I think your comment about the subjects being a fair distance from the background is key. You certainly need that extra distance so that you can blur the background enough to make your subjects the stars of the show.

  7. Alex permalink
    May 28, 2008 10:40 am

    Thanks! And thanks for the comment on Malakhi :) Lot’s more here…

    http://web.mac.com/alexlindsay (there’s an updating gallery there).

    Yes, paying attention to the background (and it’s distance) is super important. In general, you need to slowly train your eye to pay attention to everything in the frame…and look for that framing even when you’re not shooting.

  8. Alex permalink
    May 28, 2008 10:40 am

    Thanks! And thanks for the comment on Malakhi :) Lot’s more here…

    http://web.mac.com/alexlindsay (there’s an updating gallery there).

    Yes, paying attention to the background (and it’s distance) is super important. In general, you need to slowly train your eye to pay attention to everything in the frame…and look for that framing even when you’re not shooting.

  9. Gary permalink
    May 28, 2008 12:00 pm

    was that the $100 canon 50mm ? What are you thoughts on that lens?

  10. Gary permalink
    May 28, 2008 12:00 pm

    was that the $100 canon 50mm ? What are you thoughts on that lens?

  11. Todd Peterson permalink
    May 28, 2008 12:06 pm

    Wow! It’s easy to see that the grandparents are proud! Great photo.

  12. Todd Peterson permalink
    May 28, 2008 12:06 pm

    Wow! It’s easy to see that the grandparents are proud! Great photo.

  13. May 28, 2008 1:46 pm

    Very nice picture. And good point about visualizing backgrounds wherever you are.

    The only criticism I can make of the photo itself (which, I know, is not the point here … sorry) is that the framing seems a bit off … too much room on the sides and/or not enough head room for your father-in-law. Seems like a more square aspect ratio for the print would do this portrait some good. Makes shopping for a frame a major pain, but might be worth it.

    Question: how many takes did you sit through to get this one? There’s little more difficult in photography than catching a small child’s attention and smile on film (er, electrons?) at the same time. Sometimes I feel like I’m walking a fine line between getting a memorable photograph and making the photo session memorably painful to everyone else who has to stand there trying to look natural while I make goofy noises and movements for the benefit of the smallest.

  14. May 28, 2008 1:46 pm

    Very nice picture. And good point about visualizing backgrounds wherever you are.

    The only criticism I can make of the photo itself (which, I know, is not the point here … sorry) is that the framing seems a bit off … too much room on the sides and/or not enough head room for your father-in-law. Seems like a more square aspect ratio for the print would do this portrait some good. Makes shopping for a frame a major pain, but might be worth it.

    Question: how many takes did you sit through to get this one? There’s little more difficult in photography than catching a small child’s attention and smile on film (er, electrons?) at the same time. Sometimes I feel like I’m walking a fine line between getting a memorable photograph and making the photo session memorably painful to everyone else who has to stand there trying to look natural while I make goofy noises and movements for the benefit of the smallest.

  15. May 28, 2008 3:14 pm

    Alex… Malakhi is absolutely adorable. Great photo.

  16. May 28, 2008 3:14 pm

    Alex… Malakhi is absolutely adorable. Great photo.

  17. Kent Goldings permalink
    May 28, 2008 3:46 pm

    When it is very sunny, sometimes it’s difficult to open the aperture that wide, even in the shade. How did you cope with this? P.S. getting the baby to look at the camera is probably at least a year away.

  18. Kent Goldings permalink
    May 28, 2008 3:46 pm

    When it is very sunny, sometimes it’s difficult to open the aperture that wide, even in the shade. How did you cope with this? P.S. getting the baby to look at the camera is probably at least a year away.

  19. May 29, 2008 6:09 am

    Alex – Thanks for this post. I really appreciate the way you talked through the “step-by-step” way you made your decisions and pointed out all of the factors you took into account. This single post will make me a better photographer and I really appreciate it.

  20. May 29, 2008 6:09 am

    Alex – Thanks for this post. I really appreciate the way you talked through the “step-by-step” way you made your decisions and pointed out all of the factors you took into account. This single post will make me a better photographer and I really appreciate it.

  21. Alex permalink
    May 29, 2008 11:54 am

    Thanks everyone! Few things… $100 50mm is fine if you are getting started (you NEED to have a fast 50mm). I should have bought the 1.4. I’m still on the fence about Nikon vs Canon so I’m spending on glass right now. Framing – This was a single take with impatient grandparents and impatient son. He is usually _very_ good at looking at the camera…check my gallery for examples…but there were alot of people there and I was further away. As far as the space…given Malakhi’s position, John’s head, and a 2×3 aspect…that was what I thought was the best option. As far as coping with wide apertures, I tend to shoot less when I can’t open up (if it’s people), or I find shade, or I use a zoom and step back/zoom in. I think sharp backgrounds look like snapshots.

  22. Alex permalink
    May 29, 2008 11:54 am

    Thanks everyone! Few things… $100 50mm is fine if you are getting started (you NEED to have a fast 50mm). I should have bought the 1.4. I’m still on the fence about Nikon vs Canon so I’m spending on glass right now. Framing – This was a single take with impatient grandparents and impatient son. He is usually _very_ good at looking at the camera…check my gallery for examples…but there were alot of people there and I was further away. As far as the space…given Malakhi’s position, John’s head, and a 2×3 aspect…that was what I thought was the best option. As far as coping with wide apertures, I tend to shoot less when I can’t open up (if it’s people), or I find shade, or I use a zoom and step back/zoom in. I think sharp backgrounds look like snapshots.

  23. Kent Goldings permalink
    May 29, 2008 1:19 pm

    Alex, I agree. But, I’m the snapshot king.

  24. Kent Goldings permalink
    May 29, 2008 1:19 pm

    Alex, I agree. But, I’m the snapshot king.

  25. Jim permalink
    May 29, 2008 3:14 pm

    Alex,
    Wow that is a great shot. I need to to get me a 50mm and do more snapshots.

  26. Alex permalink
    May 29, 2008 6:49 pm

    I have a that 50mm on my camera set to 1.8 about 80% of the time. I occasionally close down a few stops to get someone’s whole head…but not often.

    I do think the 1.4 is much better on many levels.

  27. Alex permalink
    May 29, 2008 6:49 pm

    I have a that 50mm on my camera set to 1.8 about 80% of the time. I occasionally close down a few stops to get someone’s whole head…but not often.

    I do think the 1.4 is much better on many levels.

  28. Iain permalink
    May 29, 2008 8:27 pm

    The 1.4 would have improved the bokeh immensely.

  29. Iain permalink
    May 29, 2008 8:27 pm

    The 1.4 would have improved the bokeh immensely.

  30. May 30, 2008 8:55 pm

    Now that’s thinking like a photographer… Outstanding result!

  31. May 30, 2008 8:55 pm

    Now that’s thinking like a photographer… Outstanding result!

Comments are closed.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 12,355 other followers