Skip to content

New Canon Commercial is a Must See

May 24, 2008
tags:

canon-spot.jpg

Okay – I don’t usually post stuff like this, but this is so cool I can’t help it. Canon has a new commercial that was actually shot almost entirely with their Canon EOS 1DS MKIII cameras. 10 photographers made 70,000 images to build the show.

If you go to their page and click the middle link you can see how they did it. The photos were shot from different angles and then sequenced together. The visual effect is simply stunning.

I think this is a sneak peek at how still cameras may be used in the future. With a 21.1-megapixel image, there’s enough information there to use in motion pictures!

(Thanks to the dozen or so TWIP listeners who sent this link to me.)

55 Comments
  1. howard permalink
    May 24, 2008 7:43 am

    Great commercial. I guess this means they are marketing the XSi as a sports camera.

  2. howard permalink
    May 24, 2008 7:43 am

    Great commercial. I guess this means they are marketing the XSi as a sports camera.

  3. Shawn permalink
    May 24, 2008 7:49 am

    Isn’t this misleading? I would assume all the photo’s were shot with the new XSI although it says on the canon site it was shot entirely with EOS cameras. Cool commercial though, wonder about the ethics.

  4. Shawn permalink
    May 24, 2008 7:49 am

    Isn’t this misleading? I would assume all the photo’s were shot with the new XSI although it says on the canon site it was shot entirely with EOS cameras. Cool commercial though, wonder about the ethics.

  5. May 24, 2008 7:53 am

    That is an incredible ad. The soundtrack gives it quite a lot of emotion as well.

  6. May 24, 2008 7:53 am

    That is an incredible ad. The soundtrack gives it quite a lot of emotion as well.

  7. May 24, 2008 8:01 am

    It is a great commercial, but for one minor detail. It was shot with a Canon EOS 1DS MKIII not a Rebel XSi. The images, the production is great, but it is for the wrong camera. For me that is like seeing a car that is selling a ford Fiesta with a Dodge Vipers stats. If they were pushing the Canon EOS 1DS MKIII or the Canon line in general it would be Fantastic.

  8. May 24, 2008 8:13 am

    Pretty cool, Scott. Now, is there an equivalent Nikon D3 site? ;-)

  9. May 24, 2008 8:13 am

    Pretty cool, Scott. Now, is there an equivalent Nikon D3 site? ;-)

  10. Derek permalink
    May 24, 2008 8:55 am

    This commercial makes me want to go out and buy a 1DS…..maybee an Xsi.

  11. Derek permalink
    May 24, 2008 8:55 am

    This commercial makes me want to go out and buy a 1DS…..maybee an Xsi.

  12. Derek permalink
    May 24, 2008 9:00 am

    The behind the scenes video is very cool too. Think marching band when watching.

  13. Derek permalink
    May 24, 2008 9:00 am

    The behind the scenes video is very cool too. Think marching band when watching.

  14. Mike VD permalink
    May 24, 2008 9:15 am

    “With a 21.1-megapixel image, there’s enough information there to use in motion pictures!”

    Did you know that the entirety of Corpse Bride was shot with a 5D? The blu-ray is stunning.

  15. May 24, 2008 9:20 am

    Hehe, it would be ironic if they shot this on a D3! :-) On a more serious note, I’m not quite sure what I think of using images from the IDs Mark III in a XSi ad…

  16. May 24, 2008 9:20 am

    Hehe, it would be ironic if they shot this on a D3! :-) On a more serious note, I’m not quite sure what I think of using images from the IDs Mark III in a XSi ad…

  17. Mike VD permalink
    May 24, 2008 9:21 am

    Well, I’ll correct myself. The Almighty Wiki says Corpse Bride was shot with a Canon EOS-1D Mark II

  18. Mike VD permalink
    May 24, 2008 9:21 am

    Well, I’ll correct myself. The Almighty Wiki says Corpse Bride was shot with a Canon EOS-1D Mark II

  19. May 24, 2008 9:59 am

    This is TOTAL bait and Switch……Like everyone said, they are shooting images with a camera that is far superior image wise then the camera they are advertising. Canon is not the only people that do it, but it is false advertising in my eyes.

    Reminds me of the Canon Banner I saw at the Future Shop (Best Buy owned Canadian electronics store) It states “Shoot like a Pro” with a picture of a Canon Rebel….Made me laugh out loud really.

    As for the production value of the commercial….Yes it is very cool!

  20. May 24, 2008 9:59 am

    This is TOTAL bait and Switch……Like everyone said, they are shooting images with a camera that is far superior image wise then the camera they are advertising. Canon is not the only people that do it, but it is false advertising in my eyes.

    Reminds me of the Canon Banner I saw at the Future Shop (Best Buy owned Canadian electronics store) It states “Shoot like a Pro” with a picture of a Canon Rebel….Made me laugh out loud really.

    As for the production value of the commercial….Yes it is very cool!

  21. May 24, 2008 10:09 am

    I put this up because I thought the concept and how they did it was very cool. I am not making any judgment of the ethics of it. But I would point out that Canon has been pretty open about this project being photographed by 1DS MKIII cameras. It’s advertising folks – you should automatically discount ALL advertising in my opinion. Like I said, to me, the cool thing is the idea – 10 photographers shooting tens of thousands of images, etc.

  22. May 24, 2008 10:09 am

    I put this up because I thought the concept and how they did it was very cool. I am not making any judgment of the ethics of it. But I would point out that Canon has been pretty open about this project being photographed by 1DS MKIII cameras. It’s advertising folks – you should automatically discount ALL advertising in my opinion. Like I said, to me, the cool thing is the idea – 10 photographers shooting tens of thousands of images, etc.

  23. Miguel permalink
    May 24, 2008 10:27 am

    i don’t see what 21.1 mp has to do with it. HD is significantly less in terms of absolute resolution.

  24. Miguel permalink
    May 24, 2008 10:27 am

    i don’t see what 21.1 mp has to do with it. HD is significantly less in terms of absolute resolution.

  25. Owpuz permalink
    May 24, 2008 4:48 pm

    The corpse bride is a mor or less a puppet movie, and could be shot with any still camera. The idea is cool though. What if canon could produce a monster that could produce 24fps with 21.1mp full sensor. That would be like shooting on film but not on film….
    Maby there is a monster out there already I havn’t really been following the video front lately. My mind just went berzerk thinking about it, it would be sweet!

  26. Lance G. permalink
    May 24, 2008 7:16 pm

    @Everyone I do agree that it seems somewhat misleading to shoot the pictures with a camera that is different than the camera advertised. But I really think that the point of the commercial was that there is an easy to use, inexpensive EOS camera that will now allow people to go out and shoot, shoot, shoot the events in their life. I don’t think they were advertising total image quality. But I do see the point you guys are making.

    @Mike VD
    Funny thing about that Corpse Bride movie…
    They originally invested a lot of money in Nikon SLRs and Nikon glass to shoot the movie with, but realized that the Nikon couldn’t respond to their satisfaction. So they went with a MUCH faster camera in the 1D Mk II. But here’s the funny part…

    They did not re-invest in Canon glass. They actually used an adapter that allowed them to mount the Nikon lenses onto the 1D Mk II.

    It pains me to tell you that part, since I work for Canon as a Technical Training Specialist for Cameras at their U.S. Tech Support Center. And we like to stress the L glass advantage. :-) Cheers!

  27. Lance G. permalink
    May 24, 2008 7:16 pm

    @Everyone I do agree that it seems somewhat misleading to shoot the pictures with a camera that is different than the camera advertised. But I really think that the point of the commercial was that there is an easy to use, inexpensive EOS camera that will now allow people to go out and shoot, shoot, shoot the events in their life. I don’t think they were advertising total image quality. But I do see the point you guys are making.

    @Mike VD
    Funny thing about that Corpse Bride movie…
    They originally invested a lot of money in Nikon SLRs and Nikon glass to shoot the movie with, but realized that the Nikon couldn’t respond to their satisfaction. So they went with a MUCH faster camera in the 1D Mk II. But here’s the funny part…

    They did not re-invest in Canon glass. They actually used an adapter that allowed them to mount the Nikon lenses onto the 1D Mk II.

    It pains me to tell you that part, since I work for Canon as a Technical Training Specialist for Cameras at their U.S. Tech Support Center. And we like to stress the L glass advantage. :-) Cheers!

  28. SeanB permalink
    May 24, 2008 9:20 pm

    The actual commercial video is quite amazing, but the 2nd video showing the making of the commercial is just amazing.

  29. SeanB permalink
    May 24, 2008 9:20 pm

    The actual commercial video is quite amazing, but the 2nd video showing the making of the commercial is just amazing.

  30. Kendall Lister permalink
    May 25, 2008 12:03 am

    Heh, I just came here to mention the ad but I was soundly beaten to it. But on the topic of “bait and switch”, since the images have been presented at such a small size on the web site, is it really a big issue? I would certainly be more compelled by the ad if they made a big deal out of it being shot with with camera they are promoting, but they really don’t seem to be pushing the image quality at all.

    Actually, I’ve just re-read the ad and this sentence does kind of stick out as slightly disingenuous: “The TV commercial for the Digital Rebel XSi demonstrate the power of photography in a unique way – by actually showing real photographs taken by Canon digital SLR cameras”. Right, but not the ones we’re trying to sell to you…

    Ok, I’ve changed my mind – I don’t think this is dishonest, but it is certainly clumsy marketing. It reminds me of the mobile phone ads on television that clearly have a fake image super-imposed after the fact on the body of the phone to make the screen look brighter and clearer – not exactly wrong, but still leaving a bad taste in my mouth.

    But as Scott suggested, the ads certainly do make photography look and sound cool :)

  31. Kendall Lister permalink
    May 25, 2008 12:03 am

    Heh, I just came here to mention the ad but I was soundly beaten to it. But on the topic of “bait and switch”, since the images have been presented at such a small size on the web site, is it really a big issue? I would certainly be more compelled by the ad if they made a big deal out of it being shot with with camera they are promoting, but they really don’t seem to be pushing the image quality at all.

    Actually, I’ve just re-read the ad and this sentence does kind of stick out as slightly disingenuous: “The TV commercial for the Digital Rebel XSi demonstrate the power of photography in a unique way – by actually showing real photographs taken by Canon digital SLR cameras”. Right, but not the ones we’re trying to sell to you…

    Ok, I’ve changed my mind – I don’t think this is dishonest, but it is certainly clumsy marketing. It reminds me of the mobile phone ads on television that clearly have a fake image super-imposed after the fact on the body of the phone to make the screen look brighter and clearer – not exactly wrong, but still leaving a bad taste in my mouth.

    But as Scott suggested, the ads certainly do make photography look and sound cool :)

  32. Richard permalink
    May 25, 2008 2:16 am

    I agree with Scott – it’s a great video and concept. It’s a shame that they didn’t use the rebel, but that’s marketing for you.

  33. Richard permalink
    May 25, 2008 2:16 am

    I agree with Scott – it’s a great video and concept. It’s a shame that they didn’t use the rebel, but that’s marketing for you.

  34. mark wakefield permalink
    May 25, 2008 5:13 am

    I liked it :)
    and iam a Pentax shooter

  35. mark wakefield permalink
    May 25, 2008 5:13 am

    I liked it :)
    and iam a Pentax shooter

  36. Roger permalink
    May 25, 2008 7:28 am

    It was a moderately interesting commercial. Why did it need to be made with 1Ds III’s ? I don’t know.

    Full HD screens are only 2MP. Why does now having a 21MP camera make it possible to make movies with a still camera?

  37. kj.image permalink
    May 25, 2008 2:40 pm

    I saw that ad yesterday, was really cool. But thought aout the poor guys camers shooting in the pooring rain and all. Really nice ad though.

    kj

  38. kj.image permalink
    May 25, 2008 2:40 pm

    I saw that ad yesterday, was really cool. But thought aout the poor guys camers shooting in the pooring rain and all. Really nice ad though.

    kj

  39. May 26, 2008 7:58 am

    I think the ad is misleading, since the implicit message is of superfast frame rate, making it a kick-ass sports camera. That’s when the fact that they actually did take it with a kick-ass sports camera is germane.

    Minor correction to OP: The commercial was shot with the 1D III, not the 1DS III, which is where the frame rate comes in.

  40. May 26, 2008 7:58 am

    I think the ad is misleading, since the implicit message is of superfast frame rate, making it a kick-ass sports camera. That’s when the fact that they actually did take it with a kick-ass sports camera is germane.

    Minor correction to OP: The commercial was shot with the 1D III, not the 1DS III, which is where the frame rate comes in.

  41. May 26, 2008 8:57 am

    I know most of the people (not all – but a majority) of the people who took the time to say the ad is misleading are Nikon shooters. Just saying…

  42. May 26, 2008 8:57 am

    I know most of the people (not all – but a majority) of the people who took the time to say the ad is misleading are Nikon shooters. Just saying…

  43. R.L. Judge permalink
    May 26, 2008 8:42 pm

    In addition to not being offended by this ad, I am also not shocked and appalled when a commercial for a camcorder has not in fact been shot with the camcorder being featured.

  44. Ron permalink
    May 28, 2008 10:51 am

    I love when I see still images being used to create action scenes in video.

  45. Ron permalink
    May 28, 2008 10:51 am

    I love when I see still images being used to create action scenes in video.

  46. May 28, 2008 11:19 am

    Just sayin’. Still, it’s not quite as funny with the Sony A700 ad that used a photo that had been taken with a Nikon … in the late 60s.

  47. May 28, 2008 11:19 am

    Just sayin’. Still, it’s not quite as funny with the Sony A700 ad that used a photo that had been taken with a Nikon … in the late 60s.

  48. Gary permalink
    May 28, 2008 11:55 am

    I am enamored with the XSi, I had an XTi and it was a huge step up. I agree that the ad is a little misleading to a photographer, but probably not as much with a soccer (or football) mom, who it seems the ad is targeted.

  49. Gary permalink
    May 28, 2008 11:55 am

    I am enamored with the XSi, I had an XTi and it was a huge step up. I agree that the ad is a little misleading to a photographer, but probably not as much with a soccer (or football) mom, who it seems the ad is targeted.

  50. May 30, 2008 12:46 pm

    Wait… you’re telling me that ADVERTISING ISN’T REALITY? You just blew my mind.

  51. May 30, 2008 12:46 pm

    Wait… you’re telling me that ADVERTISING ISN’T REALITY? You just blew my mind.

  52. Ulf Ã…gerup permalink
    May 31, 2008 2:49 am

    The point is not the image quality but the usability of the cameras. To me, the ad implies that the Rebel is good for action photography. It might be, but it is not backed up by anything in the ad. I feel it is mildly misleading, but more importantly, I think Canon missed an opportunity to actually shoot the photos with the Rebel which would raise the credibility and impact of the ad.

  53. Ulf Ã…gerup permalink
    May 31, 2008 2:49 am

    The point is not the image quality but the usability of the cameras. To me, the ad implies that the Rebel is good for action photography. It might be, but it is not backed up by anything in the ad. I feel it is mildly misleading, but more importantly, I think Canon missed an opportunity to actually shoot the photos with the Rebel which would raise the credibility and impact of the ad.

  54. Anthony permalink
    December 18, 2008 8:54 pm

    Canon Rebel Behind The Scenes

  55. Dragomirov permalink
    December 30, 2009 7:28 am

    This commercial is lacking of any sign of intelligence. It’s obviously the worst advertisement ever made.

Comments are closed.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 12,373 other followers