Skip to content

Quick Tip #2 – Stopping Down

May 19, 2008

You probably realize that a small aperture will provide you with the most depth-of-field, but stopping ALL the way down to your smallest aperture (usually the largest number, i.e., f/22, etc.) is not always a good idea. Many lenses offer a more appealing image at one stop shy of their smallest aperture. This is because of lack of contrast or flare at the smallest aperture.

28 Comments
  1. May 19, 2008 6:28 am

    Particularly true with many 3rd party lenses!

  2. May 19, 2008 6:28 am

    Particularly true with many 3rd party lenses!

  3. BruceHP permalink
    May 19, 2008 7:05 am

    Isn’t this caused by Diffraction?

    Keep Shooting!
    BruceHP

  4. BruceHP permalink
    May 19, 2008 7:05 am

    Isn’t this caused by Diffraction?

    Keep Shooting!
    BruceHP

  5. May 19, 2008 7:34 am

    It’s also worth noting that most DSLRs are diffraction limited somewhere around f/11-f/16. Going with smaller apertures will increase the DOF, but result in an overall softer image.

  6. May 19, 2008 7:34 am

    It’s also worth noting that most DSLRs are diffraction limited somewhere around f/11-f/16. Going with smaller apertures will increase the DOF, but result in an overall softer image.

  7. Dean permalink
    May 19, 2008 4:28 pm

    Thanks for that. Took some night shots around my suburb and noted the flaring at the lowest aperture. Now I know why.

    Great show and podcast guys.

    Dean

  8. Dean permalink
    May 19, 2008 4:28 pm

    Thanks for that. Took some night shots around my suburb and noted the flaring at the lowest aperture. Now I know why.

    Great show and podcast guys.

    Dean

  9. May 19, 2008 5:16 pm

    Is that a cougar??

  10. May 19, 2008 5:16 pm

    Is that a cougar??

  11. May 19, 2008 5:37 pm

    @argyle yes – rare shot of a big cat in water – they don’t like water – cougar, also called a mountain lion or puma depending on what area of the country you live in.

    This is a young cat – not fully grown, but getting there.

  12. May 19, 2008 5:37 pm

    @argyle yes – rare shot of a big cat in water – they don’t like water – cougar, also called a mountain lion or puma depending on what area of the country you live in.

    This is a young cat – not fully grown, but getting there.

  13. BruceHP permalink
    May 19, 2008 6:11 pm

    How does this problem effect really long lenses, where the physical aperture is large even at small f stops?

  14. Chuck permalink
    May 19, 2008 8:11 pm

    Hmmmm, where’s Mom? (of the mountain lion)
    Did someone have your back?
    Does it matter what the max aperture is as far as how far to stop down to get the least softening? (i.e. if the lens is a 1.4, should we stop down more or less than if a lens is a 3.5)
    Same with the zoom – if the max is 3.5-5.6 does that affect how far to stop down depending on your focal length?
    (I would think not, but I checked amateur on your poll)

    Thanks for a great podcast.

  15. Chuck permalink
    May 19, 2008 8:11 pm

    Hmmmm, where’s Mom? (of the mountain lion)
    Did someone have your back?
    Does it matter what the max aperture is as far as how far to stop down to get the least softening? (i.e. if the lens is a 1.4, should we stop down more or less than if a lens is a 3.5)
    Same with the zoom – if the max is 3.5-5.6 does that affect how far to stop down depending on your focal length?
    (I would think not, but I checked amateur on your poll)

    Thanks for a great podcast.

  16. May 19, 2008 8:59 pm

    Chuck every lens has a “sweet spot.” Typically a lens that’s variable 3.5 – 5.6 is going to have a sweet spot in the neighborhood of f/8 – f/11.

  17. May 19, 2008 8:59 pm

    Chuck every lens has a “sweet spot.” Typically a lens that’s variable 3.5 – 5.6 is going to have a sweet spot in the neighborhood of f/8 – f/11.

  18. May 20, 2008 8:11 am

    good point, I have always hated stopping down all the way, great advice

  19. May 20, 2008 8:11 am

    good point, I have always hated stopping down all the way, great advice

  20. Chuck permalink
    May 20, 2008 8:40 pm

    Thanks a lot, Scott,
    chuck
    ps. just got 3 more subscribers to your podcast at a meeting today….

  21. Chuck permalink
    May 20, 2008 8:40 pm

    Thanks a lot, Scott,
    chuck
    ps. just got 3 more subscribers to your podcast at a meeting today….

  22. May 26, 2008 1:10 pm

    do you mean diffraction? i tend to shoot full power with stobes that sometimes bring up to the upper 20′s. the school of thought there is that the higher the exposure the better the detail… do you agree at least for studio photography?

  23. May 26, 2008 1:10 pm

    do you mean diffraction? i tend to shoot full power with stobes that sometimes bring up to the upper 20′s. the school of thought there is that the higher the exposure the better the detail… do you agree at least for studio photography?

  24. May 26, 2008 2:13 pm

    Yes diffraction is part of the problem fully stopped down and it happens regardless of the setting; studio, outdoors, etc.

  25. May 26, 2008 2:13 pm

    Yes diffraction is part of the problem fully stopped down and it happens regardless of the setting; studio, outdoors, etc.

Trackbacks

  1. Today’s Trawl of Photo Links // Whiz Bang! Ideas
  2. Stopping Down « Greasy Pragma Photography
  3. Stopping Down « Greasy Pragma Photography

Comments are closed.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 12,373 other followers